TheUtmostTrouble TheUtmostTrouble
Notifications
Clear all

Finding Yourself

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
236 Views
Protobeing
Joined: 6 months ago
Posts: 15
Topic starter  

In Into the Wild by John Krauker, he is more forgiving towards McCandless rather than being harsh. From the beginning, Krauker admits in the Author’s Note that McCandless doesn’t “claim to be an impartial biographer”( Author’s Note pg.2), showcasing that his goal is to understand him rather than judge him. Instead of labeling Chris as a reckless fool, Krauker portrays his journey as a desire to live truthfully. When McCandless abandons his Datsun in the desert after a flash flood (pg.27), Krauker doesn’t really mock his decision as irresponsible; he presents it as a symbolic moment of change and transformation. By burning his cash and leaving his car behind, McCandless severs the connection with materialism and begins his new life guided by self-reliance and independence. Krauker also highlights that when Chris renamed himself “Alexander Supertramp” (pg. 23), he treated it as a meaningful step towards self-discovery rather than arrogance. Although Krauker includes McCandless' poor choices, like refusing help or heading into Alaska unprepared, he frames Chris within a broader sense of idealism. 

I see McCandless as an idealist who pursued freedom with courage and grit, but I also recognize his overconfidence. Wayne Westerberg describes McCandless throughout page 18 as “hungry to learn everything”(pg. 18), which supports the idea that he was intelligent and determined, but too headstrong. For example, Jan’s observation that McCandless was “underprepared, overconfident… bumbling around out there” (pg. 72) shows that he ignored basic precautions like bringing a map or taking more food. McCandless’s faith in his own mind blinded his consciousness to the real dangers of the wilderness. Yet despite those flaws, you still have to commemorate him for his commitment towards living authentically.

 


   
Quote
Protobeing
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 8
 

I agree with you on how Krakauer is more forgiving than harsh. I think the point you made about Krakauer making points seem more 'symbolic' than 'irresponsible' is well taken. I didn't really give much thought to how overconfident McCandless really was. He was very underprepared. 

The examples you chose made me really think and sit with the idea that, even though I can think whatever I want about McCandless, you are right in how I have to commend him for his commitment. I never really thought about how brave he was; regardless of other things, he was brave. 

I wonder what other people say about McCandless. Other articles, other authors, more specifically. I wonder if his parents thought he was brave or if they hated what he did. 

Do you think his parents thought he was brave as well?


   
ReplyQuote
Share: